The Best Wildlife Lens

Page updated: July 2007

When seeking out the best wildlife lens for your digital SLR, you're really looking for two features: a very long focal length and image stabilization.

Before I tackle these two features, let's talk about the definition of wildlife (to make sure that yours is the same as mine!).

First, the subject of a wildlife photo is an animal - unless, of course, your close personal acquaintances are REALLY out of control.

Second, there are two categories of wildlife: small animals that you may be able to get close to (birds, rodents, etc.) and large animals that you want to give plenty of space (lions, tigers and bears).

Regardless of the type of subject, you want the end result to be the same: a nice big close-up photo.

Wildlife photos taken with landscape and portrait lenses don't turn out very well - the main subject of the image winds up dominated by the surrounding landscape.

In order to push the landscape into the background and make your animal subject stand out, you need an extreme telephoto lens.

Extreme Telephoto = Long Focal Length

As lens focal length increases, you can get farther and farther away from your subject while still capturing a close-up photo.

For example, let's say that you have a 50mm lens and that the distance in between the camera and subject is 5 feet.

If you switch to a 600mm lens, you can walk a half block away (depending on the length of the block, of course) and still capture the same shot that you just took with the 50mm.

Lenses with extremely long focal lengths (400mm and higher) are also called extreme telephoto.

The whole point of a lens like this is that you don't have to be right on top of your subject to get a close-up photo.

This is particularily helpful when you're dealing with skittish birds and animals that might mistake you for an afternoon snack.

Image Stabilization

While an extreme telephoto lens can help you zoom in even if you're standing far away from your subjects, it comes with one drawback.

Extreme telephoto lenses magnify camera shake and generate a higher number of blurry photos.

The general rule of thumb for pictures that don't look fuzzy is that you should use a shutter speed that is faster than 1/[focal length of the lens] when holding the camera in your hands (this does not apply when your camera is on a tripod).

This means that if you're using a 50mm lens, you can get clear hand-held shots with a shutter speed of 1/60th of a second.

But if you increase the focal length of your lens to 400mm, you must also increase the shutter speed to 1/500th of a second to ensure a clear photo.

Depending on the amount of available light, you may not be able to use a fast shutter speed like 1/500.

This is where image stabilized lenses come in. A lens with an IS system reduces the effect of hand-held camera shake and helps you get clearer photos.

Only Canon and Nikon make lenses with image stabilization. Many other camera manufacturers have image stabilization built into the camera body, which works with every lens you attach.

Canon's image stabilized lenses have an IS designation (for Image Stabilization) while Nikon's are indicated with a VR (Vibration Reduction).

While image stabilization is very nice to have on an extreme telephoto, it's not a requirement for two reasons: IS is less effective when you're using the camera to track a moving subject (gazelles, anyone?) and it's of no use at all if you intend to use a tripod - the best form of image stabilization you can get.

Price and Weight

Before I present my picks for the best wildlife lenses, please brace yourself: these lenses are EXPENSIVE.

The greater the focal length of the lens, the more glass the manufacturer must use in its construction.

This has two consequences: it makes extreme telephoto lenses exceptionally large and heavy, and all of them are going to set you back a pretty penny.

And please don't buy bargain basement. Telephoto lenses that cost less than $500 do not have superior optics, and will make EVERY photo you take with your lens appear as if it's out of focus.

If wildlife photography is your passion, then it's worth it to invest in a lens that's going to help you take crisp, clear, beautiful photos.

The Best Wildlife Lenses

CANON: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM


	Cost: $1,310 Filter Size: 77mm Size: 7.4 x 3.6in (189 x 92mm) Weight: 49.6oz (1,380g)	Lens Review User Reviews Buy From Adorama Buy From Amazon
Canon's L-series lenses include the higest quality glass which produces sharp, clear, high-contrast images. This particular lens not only has a nice 400mm telephoto setting to get up close and personal with wildlife, it also includes Canon's Image Stabilization (IS) and an ultra-fast (and quiet) focusing system (USM). Unlike other lenses with twist zooms, this lens uses a push-pull mechanism (some have claimed that this "sucks" dust into the lens but this is difficult to confirm, and many reviewers deny that this happens). Finally, it includes a full-time manual focus, which means that you can use autofocus to zero in on your subject and still make small adjustments manually if you have to.

NIKON: 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR


	Cost: $480 Filter Size: 67mm Size: 3.1 x 5.6in (80 x 143mm) Weight: 26.3oz (745g)	Lens Review User Reviews Buy From Adorama Buy From Amazon
This Nikon lens has got it all for the avid wildlife photographer: a 300mm telephoto setting, Vibration Reduction (VR) and a fast internal focusing system (AF-S). Paired with high-quality optics (ED) and a relatively affordable price tag, this Nikon super-telephoto stands out from other comparable lenses in its class.

SONY: Tamron SP AF 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD (IF)


	Cost: $880 Filter Size: 86mm Size: 8.9 x 3.7in (227 x 93mm) Weight: 43.6oz (1237g)	Lens Review Read Reviews Buy From Adorama
There are a limited number of options when it comes to wildlife lenses for the Sony SLR, but the Tamron 200-500mm fits the bill. While Sony's built-in image stabilization will help you get clear shots at the extreme telephoto setting (500mm), it's a better idea to attach the lens to a stable surface using the included tripod mount.

PENTAX: Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX DG IF HSM APO


	Cost: $1,100 Filter Size: 82mm Size: 8.9 x 3.6in (227 x 92.4mm) Weight: 50.8oz (1,440g)	Buy From Adorama Buy From Amazon
This hard-to-find Sigma lens has a lot going for it: a wide constant maximum aperture of f/4, inner focusing and inner zooming (the length of the lens never changes) and a high-speed focusing system (HSM). All this adds up to a great lens for Pentax wildlife photographers - provided you can find a manufacturer that stocks it.

OLYMPUS: Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 E-ED


	Cost: $825 Filter Size: 67mm Size: 6.2 x 3.4in (157 x 87mm) Weight: 38.4oz (1,070g)	Buy From Adorama Buy From Amazon
While I was originally going to recommend the Sigma 50-500mm lens, it turns out that it's out of stock for the Olympus mount. Since this is the case, the most affordable wildlife lens for the Olympus digital SLR cameras is this one. While it doesn't have the same zoom range as some of the other lenses on this page, it makes up for that with a much wider maximum aperture. If you'd like to get more on the telephoto end, you can pair this lens with the Olympus 1.4x teleconverter ($385), which will increase the telephoto setting to almost 300mm.